Direct answer

Can AI extract quantities or line items from project documents?

A practical answer for Singapore AEC firms deciding whether this workflow is worth testing.

Where it helps

Good automation starts where rules and repetition are visible.

These are the parts of the workflow that can usually become a controlled first pass with review gates.

Where it helps

Pulling line items from schedules

Where it helps

Comparing document versions

Where it helps

Flagging missing fields

Where it helps

Preparing a review spreadsheet

Where it helps

Separating confident and uncertain extraction

Where it helps

Matching items against a template

Where it should stay human

Judgement and accountability stay with the firm.

Praeco's pattern is preparation, checking and review support. The accountable professional still decides what goes out.

Stays human

Measurement judgement

Stays human

Ambiguous scope interpretation

Stays human

Contractual reliance

Stays human

Final BOQ approval

What to test first

Use one anonymised document set with the expected output spreadsheet so accuracy can be checked directly.

The first diagnostic is free and focused on proving whether one workflow is a real automation candidate.

What Praeco would need to see

Praeco would need sample documents, the target spreadsheet format, known edge cases, and the review rules.

Client details can be removed or anonymised. The important part is seeing the real inputs, output format and review rule.

Next step

Send one anonymised document set for a free diagnostic.

Send one repeated workflow and Praeco will check whether it is a good candidate before proposing any build.