Map the repeat work
Handover, report, approval, follow-up, or reconciliation.
Singapore SME automation
One automation.
Chosen on evidence.
Built to pay back.
We're Singapore investor-operators — not consultants billing by the hour, not a bot shop. Tell us where work repeats and we'll rank what's worth automating.
The first thing we hand back isn't a tool — it's a ranked build / no-build recommendation.
The method
Start like an investor, not a tool vendor.
We look at your business the way we'd look at one we might buy: where does owner time leak, where does the handover break, and which automation has the clearest payback?
Rank the payback
Score value, effort, risk, and how ready the owner and team are.
Build one system
Ship the highest-payback automation with checks and a clean handover.
What we automate
Six workflow shapes. One decision rule.
Content, design and AEC, internal apps, handovers, reporting — we stay broad. The rule never changes: repeated work, clear inputs, review gates, and a payback we can point to.
Owner decisions stop disappearing in chat.
OwnerTeamClient
Approvals, reminders, and handovers become a visible operating flow.
Messy inputs become a clean review list.
InvoicesRulesCheckMismatchesApprovals
Owners stop eyeballing every line — only mismatches need a human.
Exceptions surface before the weekly meeting.
Exception
A weekly routine becomes a one-click browser tool.
Drawings and decks become schedules and BOQs.
DeckPlanScheduleBOQ
One brief becomes a full production packet.
BriefCalendarDraftsReview
Proof-first loop
We prove it on your files before you pay for the build.
Proof is the decision gate. We run the hard part of the workflow on real samples first — so the full build is a known quantity, not a bet.
01AuditFind repeated work
→
02ProofTest on real files
→
03BuildShip one tool
→
04HandoverYou own it
Sample diagnostic output
Build / no-build recommendation
Workflow problemInvoices that do not match the PO, delivery note, or agreed price wait for owner review
FrequencyWeekly
OwnerFounder / Ops lead
Proof result8 of 10 sample invoices sorted correctly: approve, check, or missing info
ReadinessGood with samples
RecommendationBuild a checker that flags invoices needing review. Keep payment approval with the owner.
Our name
Praeco was the herald of the Roman forum.
Praeco — pronounced PRAY-koh — was the voice that announced public business in the place where the city actually did its business.
We took the name because that's the job: cut the noise and say plainly what's worth doing.
Why Praeco Labs
Investors and operators first.
Most AI help comes two ways: consultants who bill by the hour for a deck, or agencies who sell you a bot and move on. We're neither.
We run from a Singapore investment/operator desk, so every build is treated like capital allocation: prove the hard part first, then spend only where owner time or cash comes back.
One automationRanked diagnostic4–6 week buildMeasured payback
Start here
Send one workflow.
Tell us where work repeats, stalls, or waits on owner approval. We'll tell you if it's worth automating.
What to send
1. Where it starts
2. Who touches it
3. Where it breaks
4. What good output looks like
Email the workflow
No mail app? Copy the four prompts and send them to [email protected]. We reply with one of three answers: not worth automating, prove the hard part first, or scope a 4–6 week build.